Secret friends live sex chat little
When we study animal reproduction, we often focus on the actual . Daniel Bergner interviews scientists who study sexual behavior in animals – and the results are interesting.Even in species as diverse as rats and rhesus monkeys, the sexuality. And yet, this fact was ignored in medical textbooks and anatomical illustrations until recently.In the opening chapters of his book, Daniel Berenger talks about an eye-opening study regarding the differences between female and male sexuality. Meredith Chivers, a professor of Clinical Psychology at Queen’s University conducted a study of the sexual response in men and women, comparing one’s subjective arousal to the arousal as measured by blood flow to the genitals.Subjects – men and women of various sexual orientations – would watch an assortment of videos of 90 seconds each- heterosexual and homosexual couples having sex, nude men, nude women, men and women masturbating and a pair of bonobos mating.
The madonna/whore dichotomy was well and truly in place early on.
But we’ve seen over and over again that, in fact, human sexuality has far less to do with reproduction than evo-psych would have us believe.
We let the narrative control how we see the world and that belief affects everything else.
Much of our belief about human sexuality – the importance and universality of monogamy, for example – stem from the Flintsonization of primitive cultures.
Darwin was a notorious prude and this directly influenced his interpretations of evolution, as well as the interpretations of those who came after him.
In Ovid’s of women’s sexual pleasure in order to ensure conception…